朱永彪,王俊超

• 1:兰州大学青藏高原人文环境数据智能实验室
• 2:兰州大学政治与国际关系学院

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的/意义]美国是影响上海合作组织(以下简称“上合组织”)发展的重要外部因素之一。在错综复杂的国际局势叠加地缘政治风险的背景下，研究外部力量对上合组织的认知，对该组织在国际和地区事务中发挥建设性作用具有重要意义。[方法/过程]选取美国11家代表性智库的重要文献作为研究样本，运用文献分析法，梳理美国智库对上合组织在政治维度、经济维度、安全维度和人文维度的认知，分析美国智库对上合组织的认知特点、动因和目的。[结果/结论]研究表明，受意识形态偏见的主观认识与反华工具的自我定位，美国政府战略趋向的推动与智库职能的任务转向等因素的影响，美国智库对上合组织的认知与研究，呈现基础研究与热点分析并重、情绪化表达认知与理性声音交织、“冷战”思维与霸权意识凸显、研究主体与研究经费增加的特点。为此，中国应做好着力推动上合组织与地区多边合作机制的衔接，客观、辩证地看待美国智库的有益建议，强化上海合作组织智库的统筹整合等方面的工作。

关键词(KeyWords)： 美国智库;上海合作组织;中亚;战略竞争;国家安全

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金重点项目“多重危机和博弈加剧背景下的阿富汗安全形势及对策研究”（项目编号：21AGJ014）研究成果之一

作者(Author): 朱永彪,王俊超

参考文献(References)：

• [1]宋鹭,孙巧铃,李欣洁.美国智库涉华研究的“新冷战化”趋势[J].现代国际关系,2021(4):53-59,9.
• [2]Haass R N.Think tanks and US foreign policy:A policy-makers perspective[J].US Foreign Policy Agenda,2002,7(3):5-8.
• [3]陈峰.情报与智库双重视角的美国中国经济与安全评估委员会解析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(10):53-59.
• [4]Umarov T.China and Russia’s overlapping interests in Central Asia[EB/OL].[2024-03-20].https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2024/02/china-and-russias-overlapping-interests-in-central-asia.
• [5]Southerland M,Green W,Janik S.The Shanghai Cooperation Organization:A testbed for Chinese power projection[EB/OL].(2020-11-12)[2024-05-20].https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organization-Testbed_for_Chinese_Power_Projection.pdf.
• [6]Piekos W.The risks and rewards of SCO expansion[EB/OL].[2024-03-20].https://carnegie.ru/events/?fa=3225.
• [7]Haqqani H.China makes its move in Central Asia[EB/OL].[2024-03-21].https://www.hudson.org/security-alliances/china-makes-its-move-central-asia.
• [8]Eleanor A.The Shanghai Cooperation Organization[EB/OL].[2024-03-22].https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/shanghai-cooperation-organization#chapter-title-0-4.
• [9]Cooley A.The rise of the SCO as a new regional organization:Western perspectives[EB/OL].[2024-03-24].https://carnegieendowment.org/2011/03/23/rise-of-sco-as-new-regional-organization-western-perspectives-event-3225.
• [10]Jonathan E H.China and Russia:Economic Unequals[EB/OL].(2020-07-15)[2024-07-29].https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-and-russia-economic-unequals.
• [11]Hillman J E.“A ‘China Model?’ Beijing’s promotion of alternative global norms and standards.”[EB/OL].(2020-03-13)[2024-04-28].https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Jonathan%20Hillman%20Written%20Testimony%203.13.20.pdf.
• [12]Weitz R.The Shanghai Cooperation Organization:A fading star?[EB/OL].(2014-08-11)[2024-04-29].https://theasanforum.org/the-shanghai-cooperation-organization-a-fading-star/.
• [13]Hillman J E.India and Pakistan join the Shanghai Club[EB/OL].[2024-05-02].https://www.csis.org/analysis/india-and-pakistan-join-shanghai-club.
• [14]Scobell A,Ratner E,Beckley M.China’s strategy toward South and Central Asia:An empty fortress[EB/OL].(2014-08-11)[2024-05-03].https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR525.html.
• [15]Boland J.Ten years of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization:A lost decade?A partner for the U.S.?[EB/OL].[2024-05-05].https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_shanghai_cooperation_organization_boland.pdf.
• [16]Shokri U.Iran and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization[EB/OL].(2022-11-16)[2024-05-06].https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/2022/11/iran-and-the-shanghai-cooperation-organization?lang=en.
• [17]Cooper Z.The Era of Coalitions:The shifting nature of alignments in Asia[EB/OL].[2024-05-07].https://www.aei.org/articles/the-era-of-coalitions-the-shifting-nature-of-alignments-in-asia/.
• [18]Grace A.The lessons China taught itself:Why the Shanghai Cooperation Organization matters[EB/OL].[2024-05-10].https://jamestown.org/the-lessons-china-taught-itself-why-the-shanghai-cooperation-organization-matters/.
• [19]Chivvis C S,Geaghan-Breiner B.Emerging powers and the future of American statecraft[EB/OL].[2024-05-12].https://carnegie-production-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/Chivvis_Emerging-Powers_11-1.pdf.
• [20]Scobell A,Ratner E,Beckley M.China’s strategy toward South and Central Asia:An empty fortress[EB/OL].(2014-08-11)[2024-05-20].https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR525.html.
• [21]Aris S.Shanghai Cooperation Organization:Mapping multilateralism in transition NO.2[EB/OL].[2024-05-13].https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/ipi_e_pub_shanghai_cooperation.pdf.
• [22]Office of the Director of National Intelligence.National intelligence strategy (2023)[EB/OL].[2024-05-20].https://www.intelligence.gov/templates/intelgov-template/custom-sections/the-nis-at-a-glance/nis-2023/pdf/nis-2023.pdf.
• [23]Boland B.Top 50 U.S.think tanks receive over $1B from gov,defense contractors[EB/OL].(2020-10-14)[2024-05-20].https://www.theamericanconservative.com/swamp-report-top-50-u-s-think-tanks-receive-over-1b-from-gov-defense-contractors/.
• [24]郑一卉,杨向晖.美国智库的任务转向:从学术研究到战略宣传[J].和平与发展,2024(1):109-131,206-207.
• [25]朱永彪,王俊超.美国智库对“一带一路”实施十年来的认知评析[J].情报杂志,2023,42(12):83-92.
• [26]曾向红,李琳琳.国际关系中的污名与污名化[J].国际政治科学,2020,5(3):78-111.
• [27]蒋蕊韩,吴艳东.美西方构筑“价值观联盟”的动因、表现及中国应对[J].国外理论动态,2023(6):16-24.
• [28]Madan T.Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission:Hearing on China’s influence in South and Central Asia[EB/OL].(2022-05-12)[2024-05-15].https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/Tanvi_Madan_Testimony.pdf.
• [29]Brzezinski Z.The grand chessboard:American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives[M].New York:Basic Books,2016:48.
• [30]阮建平,林一斋.美国分化中俄与中国的预应思考[J].边界与海洋研究,2020,5(2):59-72.
• [31]新华社.中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅《关于加强中国特色新型智库建设的意见》[N].人民日报,2015-01-20(1).