张诗苑,王欣

• 1:中国人民公安大学国家安全学院

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的/意义]智库在全球治理中具有重要作用，开发全球治理指数产品对于我国智库提升影响力、参与全球治理有重要意义。当前，我国智库在开发此类产品方面经验不足，需要借鉴全球其他智库的成功路径。[方法/过程]本研究搜集了23个全球治理指数作为研究样本，基于技术—组织—环境（technology-organization-environment,TOE）分析框架，建立指数产品影响力的影响因素分析模型，使用模糊集定性比较分析方法分别对全球治理指数的高学术影响力和高媒体影响力生成路径进行组态分析。[结果/结论]研究发现了全球治理指数产品获得高影响力的三条主要路径，即跨国规范型、机构驱动型/权威协同型、需求牵引型/生态适配型。建议我国智库积极构建指数产品全球化传播网络，加强指数构建和开发技术方面的基础建设，提升方法论透明度和公信力，培育跨国研究共同体，提高智库研究的全球参与水平，同时，在选题上要敏锐感知全球治理需求，围绕需求开展指数创新。

关键词(KeyWords)： 全球治理指数;话语权;智库;组态分析

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中国人民公安大学研究生课程建设项目“国家安全情报专题”（项目编号：2025yjskc js003）研究成果之一

作者(Author): 张诗苑,王欣

DOI: 10.19318/j.cnki.issn.2096-1634.20250219.0004

参考文献(References)：

• [1]李国强,李初.加快中国智库国际化建设是一项重要而紧迫的任务[J].智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(2):2-7, 32.
• [2]王莉丽,戈敏,刘子赢.智库全球治理能力:理论建构与实践分析[J].中国人民大学学报, 2022, 36(2):91-102.
• [3]魏弋,丁怡,毛一涵,等.机制创新、数据驱动与全球治理:新时代中国特色新型智库建设进展[J].图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(10):40-46.
• [4]陈雪莲.全球治理评估制度性话语权研究:以世界银行“全球公共部门指数”项目为例[J].新视野,2020(1):123-128.
• [5]Benedict K. Global governance[M]//Wright J D.International Encyclopedia of the Social&Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2015:155-161.
• [6]Halliday F. Global governance:prospects and problems[J].Citizenship Studies, 2000, 4(1):19-33.
• [7]Global Challenges Foundation. Global governance[EB/OL].(2024-12-28)[2025-01-20]. https://globalchallenges.org/global-governance/.
• [8]Avant D D, Finnemore M, Sell S K. Who governs the globe?[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2010:1-32.
• [9]Donaubauer J, Meyer B E, Nunnenkamp P. A new global index of infrastructure:construction, rankings and applications[J]. The World Economy, 2016, 39(2):236-259.
• [10]Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M. The worldwide governance indicators:methodology and analytical issues[J]. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2011, 3(2):220-246.
• [11]Wei Y R. A novel automatic reflective indexing(ARI)method to create a world peace index[D]. Berkshire:University of Reading, 2023:1-81.
• [12]Versteeg M, Ginsburg T. Measuring the rule of law:A comparison of indicators[J]. Law and Social Inquiry,2017, 42(1):100-137.
• [13]Coduras A, Autio E. Comparing subjective and objective indicators to describe the national entrepreneurial context:the global Entrepreneurship monitor and the global competitiveness index contributions[J].Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research, 2013(26):47-74.
• [14]付满.欧洲视野下跨大西洋伙伴关系的竞合共存之道:基于《慕尼黑安全报告》的解读[J].外语学刊,2024(1):105-111.
• [15]王娟娟,张倩.全球主要网络安全指数研究[J].信息通信技术与政策, 2024, 50(8):2-8.
• [16]周永庆,陈劲,许冠南.中国复杂产品系统创新关键成功影响因素研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2006, 18(1):6-12.
• [17]方炜,孙树栋.新产品研发项目关键成功因素实证研究:基于不同的企业创新战略[J].科研管理, 2007,28(5):102-109.
• [18]To r n a t z k y L G , F l e i s c h e r M. T h e p r o c e s s e s o f technological innovation[M]. Lexington:Lexington Books, 1990:1.
• [19]丁依霞,徐倪妮,郭俊华.基于TOE框架的政府电子服务能力影响因素实证研究[J].电子政务, 2020(1):103-113.
• [20]Ragin C C. The comparative method:moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1987:93-94.
• [21]Ragin C C. Fuzzy-set social science[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2000:127-128.
• [22]Rihoux B, Ragin C C. Configurational comparative methods:qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications Inc., 2009:1-18.
• [23]张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业:基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济, 2019(4):117-135.
• [24]Schneider C Q, Wagemann C. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012:253-274.
• [25]Social Progress Imperative. 2024 social progress index[R/OL].(2024-01-05)[2024-12-20]. https://cdn.prod.websitefiles.com/6650cb66e461b93f1a906cf2/667c5a2410e6e419272df71a_Global%20Social%20Progress%20Index%20Executive%20Summary%20.pdf.
• [26]Wiemers M, Bachmeier M, Hanano A, et al. 2024 global hunger index:how gender justice can advance climate resilience and zero hunger[R/OL].(2024-10-10)[2024-12-20]. https://www.globalhungerindex.org/pdf/en/2024.pdf.
• [27]Economist Intelligence Unit. Democracy index 2022:frontline democracy and the battle for Ukraine[R/OL].(2023-02-02)[2024-12-20]. https://www.eiu.com/n/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Democracy-Index-2022_FV2.pdf.
• [28]World Justice Project. The world justice project rule of law index 2024[R/OL].(2024-10-23)[2024-12-20]. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/downloads/WJPIndex2024.pdf.
• [29]Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.The global organized crime index 2023:a global x-ray of organized crime[R/OL].(2023-09-26)[2024-12-20].https://globalinitiative.net/analysis/ocindex-2023/.
• [30]Cato Institute, Fraser Institute. The human freedom index 2023:a global measurement of personal, civil, and economic freedom[R/OL].(2023-12-20)[2024-12-20].https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2023-12/humanfreedom-index-2023-full-revised.pdf.
• [31]Lowy Institute. Global diplomacy index 2024 key findings report[R/OL].(2024-10-17)[2024-12-20]. https://globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute.org/downloads/GDI_Key_Findings.pdf.
• [32]Global Center on AI Governance. Global index on responsible AI 2024(1st edition)[R/OL].(2024-06-13)[2024-12-20]. https://girai-report-2024-corrected-edition.tiiny.site/.
• [33]Tortoise. The global artificial intelligence index2024[R/OL].(2024-09-19)[2024-12-20]. https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2024/09/19/the-global-artificialintelligence-index-2024.
• [34]Huawei. Global digitalization index 2024[R/OL].(2024-09-21)[2024-12-20]. https://www-file.huawei.com/-/media/corp2020/gdi/pdf/gdi-2024-en.pdf la=en.
• [35]The China Economic&Strategy Initiative. Global influence index[EB/OL].(2024-10-14)[2024-12-20].https://gii.cesionline.org/.
• [36]Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security,Peace Research Institute Oslo. Women, peace and security index 2023/24:tracking sustainable peace through inclusion, justice, and security for women[R/OL].(2023-10-23)[2024-12-20]. https://giwps.georgetown.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2023/10/WPS-Index-full-report.pdf.
• [37]Institute for Economics&Peace. Global peace index2023:measuring peace in a complex world[R/OL].(2023-06-12)[2024-12-20]. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GPI-2023-Web.pdf.
• [38]Gallup. Global law and order index 2022[R/OL].(2022-10-27)[2024-12-20]. http://www.langstonphotogallup.com/pdf/2022_global_law_and_order_report.pdf.
• [39]Fund for Peace. Fragile states index 2023–Annual report[R/OL].(2023-06-14)[2024-12-20]. https://fragilestatesindex.org/2023/06/14/fragile-states-index-2023-annual-report/.
• [40]Institute for Economics&Peace. Global terrorism index2024:measuring the impact of terrorism[R/OL].(2024-02-29)[2024-12-20]. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/GTI-2024-web-290224.pdf.
• [41]Munich Security Conference. Munich security index2024[R/OL].(2024-02-16)[2024-12-20]. https://securityconference.org/assets/01_Bilder_Inhalte/03_Medien/02_Publikationen/2024/MSR_2024/MSR2024_MSI_mitCover_final_240507_DIGITAL.pdf.
• [42]MIT Technology Review. The cyber defense index2022/23[R/OL].(2022-11-15)[2024-12-20]. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/11/15/1063189/the-cyberdefense-index-2022-23/.
• [43]GHS Index. Global health security index:advancing collective action and accountability amid global crisis2021[R/OL].(2021-12-08)[2024-12-20]. https://ghsindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021_GHSindexFullReport_Final.pdf.
• [44]Economist Impact. Global food security index 2022:exploring challenges and developing solutions for food security across 113 countries[R/OL].(2023-04-28)[2024-12-20]. https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-security-index/resources/Economist_Impact_GFSI_2022_Global_Report_Sep_2022.pdf.
• [45]Roecker S A, Roth N, Matzkin-Bridger R, et al. The 2023NTI nuclear security index:falling short in a dangerous world[R/OL].(2023-07-19)[2024-12-20]. https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/the-2023-nti-nuclear-security-index/.
• [46]张明,王喆,陈胤默.全球数字经济发展指数报告(TIMG2023)[R/OL].(2023-05-30)[2024-12-20]. http://ifb.cass.cn/newpc/xscg/lwbg/202306/P020230601501807198861.pdf.
• [47]段丹洁.《全球治理指数2023报告》发布专家热议“危机中的全球治理”[EB/OL].(2023-11-22)[2024-12-20]. https://www.cssn.cn/gjgc/gjgc_jwzz/202311/t20231122_5698259.shtml.
• [48]华东政法大学政治学研究院,北京国际和平文化基金会,中国与全球化智库,等.全球治理指数2016年报告[R/OL].(2016-09-27)[2024-12-20]. http://www.bjipcf.org/images/pdf/20160927.pdf.
• [49]朱旭峰,苏钰.西方思想库对公共政策的影响力:基于社会结构的影响力分析框架构建[J].世界经济与政治,2004(12):21-26, 4-5.
• [50]安德鲁·里奇.智库、公共政策和专家治策的政治学[M].潘羽辉,译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2010:6.
• [51]张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(9):1312-1323.
• [52]Garcia-Castro R, Francoeur C. When more is not better:complementarities, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016,37(2):406-424.
• [53]王禹乔,王禹淋,姚添,等.全球顶级国家安全智库影响力优化路径研究:基于组态视角下的定性比较分析[J].智库理论与实践, 2024, 9(4):53-65.
• [54]Andrews R, Beynon M J, Mcdermott A M. Organizational capability in the public sector:a configurational approach[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2016,26(2):239-258.
• [55]Mcgann J G. 2020 global go to think tank index report[R/OL].(2021-01-28)[2024-12-20]. https://www.iiss.pku.edu.cn/__local/8/6A/62/7F8B67571D93FC9360384AF9F98_5DBFA2B8_F66154.pdf?e=.pdf.
• [56]四川省社会科学院,中国科学院成都文献情报中心.中华智库影响力报告(2018)[R/OL].(2018-11-21)[2024-12-20]. https://clas.cas.cn/kxyj2016/yjbg2016/201910/P020191028520249260555.pdf.
• [57]The White House. National Security Strategey[R/OL].(2022-10-22)[2024-12-20]. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-HarrisAdministrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf.
• [58]习近平.习近平:高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[R/OL].(2022-10-25)[2024-12-20]. https://www.qstheory.cn/yaowen/2022-10/25/c_1129079926.htm.
• [59]谭海波,范梓腾,杜运周.技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设:一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(9):81-94.
• [60]Fiss P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.