王向阳

• 1:天津理工大学马克思主义学院

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的/意义]美国智库强大的国际传播能力是其在国际舞台发挥影响力的重要支撑。聚焦布鲁金斯学会这一典型案例，系统解构其国际传播能力建设背后的权力机制，对理解美国代表性智库运作模式、推动中国特色新型智库国际传播能力建设、提升国际影响力具有重要参考价值。[方法/过程]本文基于批判话语分析(critical discourse analysis，CDA)与网络民族志方法，构建“知识生产–传播网络–制度嵌入”分析框架，结合布鲁金斯学会国际传播能力建设的典型案例，分析其“知识–网络/平台–权力”的运作模式和“中立性”表象下的权力本质。[结果/结论]研究结果表明，布鲁金斯学会集中体现了美国智库“知识商品化–传播资本化–制度霸权化”的闭环权力体系，有效增强了其国际传播能力。该案例揭示了美国智库国际传播能力建设的核心逻辑，对推动构建“非对称知识生产、去中心化传播和文化软传播平台”的中国特色新型智库国际传播能力建设提供了批判性参考。

关键词(KeyWords)： 布鲁金斯学会;国际传播能力;知识–权力;智库传播;批判话语分析

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 2022年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“新时代中国共产党公共危机治理中的动员机制研究”(项目编号：22YJC710016)的阶段性成果之一

作者(Author): 王向阳

DOI: 10.19318/j.cnki.issn.2096-1634.20250519.0007

参考文献(References)：

• [1]加强和改进国际传播工作展示真实立体全面的中国[N].人民日报,2021-06-02(1).
• [2]史安斌,刘长宇.效力拓展与能力升级:中国国际舆论传播力提升路径研究[J].新闻战线,2020(22):33-37.
• [3]任孟山.国际传播的路径逻辑:从能力到效力[J].对外传播,2017(1):42-43.
• [4]刘继南,周积华,段鹏,等.国际传播与国家形象:国际关系的新视角[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2002:89.
• [5]李智.国际传播能力的界定及其评估[R]// 胡正荣,李继东,姬德强.中国国际传播发展报告(2014).北京:社科文献出版社,2014:246-248.
• [6]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚(修订译本)[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012:29.
• [7]Foucault M,Gordon C.Power/Knowledge:Selected interviews and other writings,1972-1977[M].New York:Pantheon Books,1980:10-30.
• [8]Castells M.The rise of the network society[M].Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell,2009:20-55.
• [9]Francese J.Perspectives on Gramsci:Politics,culture and social theory[M].New York:Routledge,2009:71-72.
• [10]U.S.-China technology competition:A Brookings global China interview[EB/OL].(2021-12-23)[2025-02-20].https://www.brookings.edu/articles/u-s-china-technology-competition/.
• [11]CHRISTOPHER A T.A semiconductor strategy for the United States[EB/OL].(2022-11-03)[2025-02-20].https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FP_20221103_semiconductor_strategy.pdf.
• [12]Batcheck D.Reimagining the global economy:Building back better in a post-COVID-19 world[EB/OL].(2020-11-03)[2025-03-22].https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Reimagining-Global-Economy.pdf.
• [13]Sanjay P,Robert E L.TikTok shows why social media companies need more regulation[EB/OL].(2023-05-11)[2025-04-01].https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/20230511_CRM_PatnaikLitan_TikTok_FINAL.pdf.
• [14]任恒.构建我国新型智库“旋转门”机制:内涵、现状及思路[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):75-84.
• [15]Experts[EB/OL].(2025-06-26)[2025-07-13].https://www.brookings.edu/experts/.
• [16]高继卿.从《美国半导体战略》看布鲁金斯学会的公共政策研究[J].竞争情报,2023,19(4):40-47.
• [17]曼纽尔·卡斯特.传播力[M].汤景泰,星辰,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018:2.
• [18]Brookings 2023 annual report[EB/OL].(2023-11-22)[2025-04-02].https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Brookings_FY23_Annual_Report.pdf.
• [19]曼纽尔·卡斯特.千年终结[M].夏铸九,黄慧琦,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:2,576.
• [20]Crehan K.Gramsci’s common sense:Inequality and its narratives[M].Durham:Duke University Press,2016:43-58.
• [21]安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记[M].曹雷雨,姜丽,张跣,译.开封:河南大学出版社,2014:28-54.
• [22]Join the top-ranked think tank for domestic economic policy![EB/OL].(2025-04-22)[2025-05-10].https://www.brookings.edu/join-the-top-ranked-think-tank-for-domestic-economic-policy/.
• [23]FREEMAN B.Defense contractor funded think tanks dominate Ukraine debate[EB/OL].(2023-06-01)[2024-06-01].https://quincyinst.org/research/defense-contractor-funded-think-tanks-dominate-ukraine-debate/#executive-summary.
• [24]The future of American air power[EB/OL].(2022-05-02)[2025-04-15].https://www.brookings.edu/events/the-future-of-american-air-power/.
• [25]Stefen P.Arming Ukraine without crossing Russia’s red lines[EB/OL].(2023-04-06)[2025-04-16].https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2023/04/06/arming-ukraine-without-crossing-russias-red-lines/.
• [26]Egeland K,Pelopidas B.No such thing as a free donation?Research funding and conflicts of interest in nuclear weapons policy analysis[J].International Relations,2022,39(1):125-147.
• [27]How think tanks amplify corporate America’s influence[EB/OL].(2016-08-08)[2025-04-17].https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/us/politics/think-tanks-research-and-corporate-lobbying.html.
• [28]At fast-growing Brookings,donors may have an impact on research agenda[EB/OL].(2014-10-30)[2025-04-17].https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-fast-growing-brookings-donors-help-set-agenda/2014/10/30/a4ba4e8e-48ef-11e4-891d-713f052086a0_story.html.
• [29]ISAAC S F.Huawei’s surprising ties to the Brookings Institution[EB/OL].(2018-12-08)[2025-04-25].https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/08/chinese-companys-surprising-ties-brookings-institution/.
• [30]Foreign powers buy influence at think tanks[EB/OL].(2014-09-07)[2025-04-28].https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/foreign-powers-buy-influence-at-think-tanks.html.
• [31]王莉丽.论美国智库舆论影响力的形成机制[J].国外社会科学,2014(3):51-55.
• [32]Mearsheimer J J,Walt S M.The Israel lobby and US foreign policy[M].London:Allen Lane,2007:176-177.
• [33]Barros A,Taylor S.Think tanks,business and civil society:The ethics of promoting pro-corporate ideologies[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2020,162(3):505-517.
• [34]Jameson J K,Hannah M F.Contemporary trends in conflict and communication:Technology and social media[M].Berlin:De Gruyter,2022:9-28.
• [35]赖先进.国际智库发展模式[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,2017:26-27.
• [36]魏丽.政策过程理论框架下国际知名智库参与全球治理的机制研究:以美国布鲁金斯学会为例[J].智库理论与实践,2022,7(3):116-124.
• [37]Lindsey W F,Ryan H.Democracy in Asia[EB/OL].(2021-01-22)[2025-04-28].https://www.brookings.edu/articles/democracy-in-asia/.
• [38]Wheeler T,Simpson D.The digital future requires making 5G secure[EB/OL].(2022-12-12)[2025-04-28].https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-digital-future-requires-making-5g-secure/.
• [39]Joshua P M,Cameron F K.Cybersecurity and digital trade:Getting it right[EB/OL].(2019-09-18)[2025-04-29].https://www.brookings.edu/articles/cybersecurity-and-digital-trade-getting-it-right/.
• [40]朱颖,杨建林.基于内容和话语视角探究美国智库构建的中美国家形象:以布鲁金斯学会的报告为例[J].情报杂志,2023,42(10):81-88,73.
• [41]王眉.智库国际传播与对外话语体系构建[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,36(6):94-100,2.